Horton

Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-07-28T07:28:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:05:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fair enough.  List has gotten quite sophisticated now, so I understand
> the concern.

Just wondering something...  List cells include one pointer, one
signed integer and an OID.  The two last entries are basically 4-byte
each, hence could we reduce a bit the bloat by unifying both of them?
I understand that the distinction exists because both may not be of
the same size..

/me runs and hides
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Add support for --jobs in reindexdb

  2. Remove more progname references in vacuumdb.c

  3. Refactor parallelization processing code in src/bin/scripts/