Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ )
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-26T21:52:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-25, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Heh, yesterday I revised the original patch as attached and was about to > > push when the bell rang. I like this one because it keeps the comment > > to one line and it mentions the function name in charge of the > > validation (useful for grepping later on). It's a bit laconic because > > of the long function name and the desire to keep it to one line, but it > > seems sufficient to me. > > Looks fine to me. A nit: addition of braces for the if block. Even > if that a one-liner, there is a comment so I think that this makes the > code more readable. Yeah, I had removed those on purpose, but that was probably inconsistent with my own reviews of others' patches. I pushed it with them. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Don't uselessly escape a string that doesn't need escaping
- 66abcce55f12 11.5 landed
- 5ac684381df1 12.0 landed
- 52608f341607 10.10 landed
- 0f9133b66b56 9.6.15 landed
- 0994cfc0ac85 13.0 landed
-
pg_basebackup: Add --slot option
- 0dc848b0314d 9.6.0 cited