Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ )

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-26T21:52:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-25, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Heh, yesterday I revised the original patch as attached and was about to
> > push when the bell rang.  I like this one because it keeps the comment
> > to one line and it mentions the function name in charge of the
> > validation (useful for grepping later on).  It's a bit laconic because
> > of the long function name and the desire to keep it to one line, but it
> > seems sufficient to me.
> 
> Looks fine to me.  A nit: addition of braces for the if block.  Even
> if that a one-liner, there is a comment so I think that this makes the
> code more readable.

Yeah, I had removed those on purpose, but that was probably inconsistent
with my own reviews of others' patches.  I pushed it with them.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Don't uselessly escape a string that doesn't need escaping

  2. pg_basebackup: Add --slot option