Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-21T18:25:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, * Jeff Davis (pgsql@j-davis.com) wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql- > > committers > > list either, but that's probably an independent issue.) > > I was curious about that as well. The whitelists we put in place expire after a certain period of time (iirc, it's 1 year currently) and then your posts end up getting moderated. If you register that address as an alternate for you, you should be able to post with it without needing to be on a whitelist. Thanks, Stephen
Commits
-
Fix daterange canonicalization for +/- infinity.
- 613eabcd51c3 12.0 landed
- 2be355498eaf 9.4.24 landed
- 8af1fccba2b1 9.5.19 landed
- 56afeb765177 9.6.15 landed
- 955089d4d74d 10.10 landed
- f5f20deda33b 11.5 landed
- e6feef571a01 13.0 landed