Horton

Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-19T00:19:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:36:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> > I went ahead and committed this using Thomas's suggestion to remove the
> > parentheses.
> 
> The commit message claims this was back-patched, but I see no back-patch?
> 
> (The commit message doesn't seem to have made it to the pgsql-committers
> list either, but that's probably an independent issue.)

REL_12_STABLE has been missed in the set of branches patched.  Could
you fix that as well (including the extra fix b0a7e0f0)? 
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix daterange canonicalization for +/- infinity.