Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>

Cc: Ryan Lambert <ryan@rustprooflabs.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-07-15T19:58:46Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited

On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 07:34:22AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> I stand by my position. At a minimum, we need a choice of AES128 and AES256.

These are compelling arguments.  Agreed.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +