Horton

Re: Ltree syntax improvement

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-08T20:33:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2019-Jul-08, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:

> I did not introduce any functions. I've just changed the parser.

I mean the C-level functions -- count_parts_ors() and so on.

> I'm not sure that it makes sense to remove any tests as most of them were
> written to catch really happened bugs during the implementation.

Well, I don't mean to decrease the coverage, only to condense a lot of
little tests in a small powerful test.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Clean up parsing of ltree and lquery some more.