Re: TopoSort() fix
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-03T07:11:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:41:59AM +0800, Rui Hai Jiang wrote: > Could the attached patch fix this issue? Or does any one else plan to fix > it? > > If people are busy and have not time, I can go ahead to fix it. To fix > this issue, do we need a patch for each official branch? Only a committer could merge any fix you produce. What you have sent looks fine to me, so let's wait for Robert, who has visiblu broken this part to comment. Back-patched versions are usually taken care of by the committer merging the fix, and by experience it is better to agree about the shape of a patch on HEAD before working on other branches. Depending on the review done, the patch's shape may change slightly... -- Michael
Commits
-
Add an isolation test to exercise parallel-worker deadlock resolution.
- da9456d22a76 13.0 landed
-
Mark advisory-lock functions as parallel restricted, not parallel unsafe.
- 4886da832750 13.0 landed
-
Fix busted logic for parallel lock grouping in TopoSort().
- d933816c04c6 12.0 landed
- c3b613e1b0e5 9.6.15 landed
- af41ab50fdc5 10.10 landed
- 3420851a2c2d 13.0 landed
- 0dcb1c6c4874 11.5 landed