Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-06-14T03:24:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:33:10PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 02:55, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > This brings up a few points.  First, it seems the change affects
> > partitioned tables and UNION ALL, which means it probably needs to be
> > listed in two sections.   Second, is it only parallelism paths that are
> > added?  I am not sure if people care about a node being removed,
> > especially when the might not even know we do that step, but they do
> > care if there are new optimization possibilities.
> 
> Like Amit, I think the optimizer section is fine.  Another thing that
> is affected is that you may no longer get a Materialize node in the
> plan.  Previously you might have gotten something like Merge Join ->
> Materialize -> Append -> Seq Scan, now you might just get Merge Join
> -> Seq Scan.  This is because Append / MergeAppend don't support mark
> and restore. Removing them would allow the materialize node to be
> skipped in cases where the single subpath of the Append does support
> mark and restore.

How is this patch for the item?  I put it in the Optimizer section.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Commits

  1. doc: PG 12 relnotes, add mention of single-child optimization

  2. docs: split out sort-skip partition item in PG 12 release notes

  3. docs: update partition item in PG 12 release notes