Horton

Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-06-10T22:11:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2019-Jun-09, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> I think it should say:
> 
> |    Choosing the target number of partitions into which the table should be
> |    divided is also a critical decision to make.  Not having enough

I opined elsewhere in the thread that this phrase can be made into more
straightforward English:

   Choosing the target number of partitions THAT the table should be
   divided INTO is also a critical decision to make.  Not having enough

What do you think of that formulation?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. doc: Fix grammatical error in partitioning docs

  2. doc: Add best practises section to partitioning docs