Horton

Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-05-27T08:05:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:22:42AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The original patch used -o in pg_verify_checksums, the discussion of which
> started in the below mail:
> 
> https://postgr.es/m/20180228194242.qbjasdtwm2yj5rqg%40alvherre.pgsql
> 
> Since -f was already used for “force check”, -r ended up being used.  Now that
> there no longer is a -f flag in pg_checksums, it can be renamed.

Interesting point.  Thanks for sharing.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Rework options of pg_checksums options for filenode handling