Thread

Commits

  1. Fix typos.

  1. Fix typos for v12

    Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:26:10Z

    Hello hackers,
    
    I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new
    unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not
    noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos.
    1. authenticaion (user-visible string)
    2. becuase
    3. checkinunique
    4. cheep
    5. comparion (user-visible)
    6. comparision
    7. compatiblity
    8. continuescanthat
    9. current_locked_pid (user-visible)
    10. essentally
    11. exptected
    12. funcation
    13. guarantess
    14. HEAP_HASOID
    15. Interfact
    16. minimalslotslot (similar to heapslot)
    17. modifcations
    18. multiplcation
    19. optimised
    20. pased
    21. perfer
    22. relvant
    23. represnting
    24. ski p
    25. unexcpected (user-visible string)
    
    I still hope such fixes are useful and will be accepted.
    
    Best regards,
    Alexander
    
    
  2. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:42:13Z

    On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 3:56 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > Hello hackers,
    >
    > I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new
    > unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not
    > noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos.
    > 1. authenticaion (user-visible string)
    > 2. becuase
    > 3. checkinunique
    > 4. cheep
    ..
    >
    > I still hope such fixes are useful and will be accepted.
    >
    
    I think it is good to fix these.  I haven't verified all but I can
    review them.  Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of
    multiple patches?
    
    
    -- 
    With Regards,
    Amit Kapila.
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:53:11Z

    Hello Amit,
    
    25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
    > I think it is good to fix these.  I haven't verified all but I can
    > review them.  Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of
    > multiple patches?
    
    If a single patch is more convenient, then here it is.
    I thought that separate patches would be more handy in case of any doubts.
    
    Best regards,
    Alexander
    
    
  4. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T13:37:52Z

    On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:23 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > Hello Amit,
    >
    > 25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
    > > I think it is good to fix these.  I haven't verified all but I can
    > > review them.  Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of
    > > multiple patches?
    >
    > If a single patch is more convenient, then here it is.
    > I thought that separate patches would be more handy in case of any doubts.
    >
    
    I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got
    introduced in v12.  I will re-verify them once again and then commit
    your patch if I don't found any problem.  In the meantime, if anyone
    else wants to look at it, that would be great.
    
    -- 
    With Regards,
    Amit Kapila.
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2019-05-25T15:06:41Z

    Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
    > I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got
    > introduced in v12.  I will re-verify them once again and then commit
    > your patch if I don't found any problem.  In the meantime, if anyone
    > else wants to look at it, that would be great.
    
    FWIW, I'd counsel against applying the changes in imath.h/.c, as that
    is not our code, and unnecessary variations from upstream will just
    make it harder to track upstream.  The rest of this looks fine.
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  6. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-26T13:49:34Z

    On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    >
    > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
    > > I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got
    > > introduced in v12.  I will re-verify them once again and then commit
    > > your patch if I don't found any problem.  In the meantime, if anyone
    > > else wants to look at it, that would be great.
    >
    > FWIW, I'd counsel against applying the changes in imath.h/.c, as that
    > is not our code, and unnecessary variations from upstream will just
    > make it harder to track upstream.
    >
    
    This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes
    should be fine.  Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing.  So, if
    we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in
    upstream first and then take from there.
    
    >  The rest of this looks fine.
    >
    
    Thanks, pushed.
    
    -- 
    With Regards,
    Amit Kapila.
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
  7. Re: Fix typos for v12

    Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-26T15:43:41Z

    26.05.2019 16:49, Amit Kapila wrote:
    > This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes
    > should be fine.  Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing.  So, if
    > we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in
    > upstream first and then take from there.
    >
    >>  The rest of this looks fine.
    >>
    > Thanks, pushed.
    Thank you Amit!
    I've filed a Pull Request in the imath project:
    https://github.com/creachadair/imath/pull/39
    
    Best regards,
    Alexander
    
    
    
    
  8. Re: Fix typos for v12

    David Fetter <david@fetter.org> — 2019-05-26T20:21:49Z

    On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 06:43:41PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
    > 26.05.2019 16:49, Amit Kapila wrote:
    > > This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes
    > > should be fine.  Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing.  So, if
    > > we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in
    > > upstream first and then take from there.
    > >
    > >>  The rest of this looks fine.
    > >>
    > > Thanks, pushed.
    > Thank you Amit!
    > I've filed a Pull Request in the imath project:
    > https://github.com/creachadair/imath/pull/39
    
    I noticed that it's gone from upstream.  I also noticed that upstream
    did a release in January since the previous pull. Is it worth trying
    to merge those in as they arrive?
    
    Best,
    David.
    -- 
    David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
    Phone: +1 415 235 3778
    
    Remember to vote!
    Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate