Thread
Commits
-
Fix typos.
- 9679345f3c5e 12.0 landed
-
Fix typos for v12
Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:26:10Z
Hello hackers, I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos. 1. authenticaion (user-visible string) 2. becuase 3. checkinunique 4. cheep 5. comparion (user-visible) 6. comparision 7. compatiblity 8. continuescanthat 9. current_locked_pid (user-visible) 10. essentally 11. exptected 12. funcation 13. guarantess 14. HEAP_HASOID 15. Interfact 16. minimalslotslot (similar to heapslot) 17. modifcations 18. multiplcation 19. optimised 20. pased 21. perfer 22. relvant 23. represnting 24. ski p 25. unexcpected (user-visible string) I still hope such fixes are useful and will be accepted. Best regards, Alexander
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:42:13Z
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 3:56 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello hackers, > > I've done another round of cross-checking the master branch for new > unique identifiers/words. As my previous attempt to fix things was not > noticed, now I'm focusing on distinct typos. > 1. authenticaion (user-visible string) > 2. becuase > 3. checkinunique > 4. cheep .. > > I still hope such fixes are useful and will be accepted. > I think it is good to fix these. I haven't verified all but I can review them. Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of multiple patches? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T10:53:11Z
Hello Amit, 25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote: > I think it is good to fix these. I haven't verified all but I can > review them. Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of > multiple patches? If a single patch is more convenient, then here it is. I thought that separate patches would be more handy in case of any doubts. Best regards, Alexander
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-25T13:37:52Z
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 4:23 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Amit, > > 25.05.2019 13:42, Amit Kapila wrote: > > I think it is good to fix these. I haven't verified all but I can > > review them. Isn't it better to fix them as one patch instead of > > multiple patches? > > If a single patch is more convenient, then here it is. > I thought that separate patches would be more handy in case of any doubts. > I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got introduced in v12. I will re-verify them once again and then commit your patch if I don't found any problem. In the meantime, if anyone else wants to look at it, that would be great. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2019-05-25T15:06:41Z
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got > introduced in v12. I will re-verify them once again and then commit > your patch if I don't found any problem. In the meantime, if anyone > else wants to look at it, that would be great. FWIW, I'd counsel against applying the changes in imath.h/.c, as that is not our code, and unnecessary variations from upstream will just make it harder to track upstream. The rest of this looks fine. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> — 2019-05-26T13:49:34Z
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > > I have taken one pass over it and all fixes seem to be correct and got > > introduced in v12. I will re-verify them once again and then commit > > your patch if I don't found any problem. In the meantime, if anyone > > else wants to look at it, that would be great. > > FWIW, I'd counsel against applying the changes in imath.h/.c, as that > is not our code, and unnecessary variations from upstream will just > make it harder to track upstream. > This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes should be fine. Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing. So, if we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in upstream first and then take from there. > The rest of this looks fine. > Thanks, pushed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com> — 2019-05-26T15:43:41Z
26.05.2019 16:49, Amit Kapila wrote: > This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes > should be fine. Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing. So, if > we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in > upstream first and then take from there. > >> The rest of this looks fine. >> > Thanks, pushed. Thank you Amit! I've filed a Pull Request in the imath project: https://github.com/creachadair/imath/pull/39 Best regards, Alexander
-
Re: Fix typos for v12
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> — 2019-05-26T20:21:49Z
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 06:43:41PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > 26.05.2019 16:49, Amit Kapila wrote: > > This occurred to me as well while reviewing, but I thought typo fixes > > should be fine. Anyway, I have excluded those before pushing. So, if > > we want to fix these, then maybe one has to first get this fixed in > > upstream first and then take from there. > > > >> The rest of this looks fine. > >> > > Thanks, pushed. > Thank you Amit! > I've filed a Pull Request in the imath project: > https://github.com/creachadair/imath/pull/39 I noticed that it's gone from upstream. I also noticed that upstream did a release in January since the previous pull. Is it worth trying to merge those in as they arrive? Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate