Horton

Re: clean up docs for v12

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-04-27T00:44:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:17:22PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> But I think the biggest part of the patch is still not even reviewed ?
> I'm referring to ./*review-docs-for-pg12dev.patch

Nope.  I looked at the patch, and as mentioned upthread the suggested
changes did not seem like improvements as the existing sentences make
sense, at least to me.  Do you have any particular part of your patch
where you think your wording is an improvement?  Why do you think so?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Improve code inferring length of bitmap for JITed tuple deforming.

  2. Fix more typos and inconsistencies in documentation

  3. Fix collection of typos and grammar mistakes in docs and comments

  4. Clean up some documentation for log_statement_sample_rate