Re: clean up docs for v12

Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-04-26T17:17:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:50:42AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:19:55PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2019-Apr-22, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I think it'd be better just to fix s/the all/that all/.
> > 
> > (and s/if's/if it's/)
> 
> FWIW, I have noticed that part when gathering all the pieces for what
> became 148266f, still the full paragraph was sort of confusing, so I
> have just fixed the most obvious issues reported first.

I saw you closed the item here:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items&diff=33390&oldid=33389

But I think the biggest part of the patch is still not even reviewed ?
I'm referring to ./*review-docs-for-pg12dev.patch 

I haven't updated the JIT changes since there's larger discussion regarding the
code.

Justin



Commits

  1. Improve code inferring length of bitmap for JITed tuple deforming.

  2. Fix more typos and inconsistencies in documentation

  3. Fix collection of typos and grammar mistakes in docs and comments

  4. Clean up some documentation for log_statement_sample_rate