Thread
Commits
-
Fix documentation of pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup functions.
- 5241f689995d 9.6.13 landed
- 42b962176e7a 10.8 landed
- cee3cfd75c20 11.3 landed
- b804c1837b55 12.0 landed
-
Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2019-04-18T15:38:23Z
Hi, > These functions cannot be executed during recovery (except > <function>pg_is_in_backup</function>, <function>pg_backup_start_time</function> > and <function>pg_wal_lsn_diff</function>). Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above. But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc. So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought? Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive backup API was added. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
-
Re: Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2019-04-19T02:36:54Z
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:38:23AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above. > But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be > executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc. > So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought? > > Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive > backup API was added. +1. -- Michael
-
Re: Minor correction in the doc for non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> — 2019-04-22T17:46:27Z
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:36 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:38:23AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > > Regarding backup control functions, the func.sgml describes as above. > > But non-exclusive pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup can also be > > executed during recovery, and which should be described in the doc. > > So I think that the attached patch should be pushed. Thought? > > > > Probably the patch needs to be back-patched to 9.6 where non-exclusive > > backup API was added. > > +1. Thanks! Committed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao