Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-11T03:59:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 03:50:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > And here is the patch to address this issue. It happens that a bit > more than the dependency switch was lacking here: > - At swap time, we need to have the new index definition track > relispartition from the old index. > - Again at swap time, the inheritance link needs to be updated between > the old/new index and its parent when reindexing a partition index. Peter, this is an open item, and I think as the committer of the feature you are its owner. Well, in this case, I don't mind taking the ownership as need be as I know this stuff. Anyway, could you have a look at the patch proposed and see if you have any issues with it? -- Michael
Commits
-
Prevent reindex of invalid indexes on TOAST tables
- 8bca5f93547c 12.3 landed
- 61d7c7bce368 13.0 landed
-
Rework handling of invalid indexes with REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
- a6dcf9df4d91 12.0 landed
-
Split builtins.h to a new header ruleutils.h
- 7b1c2a0f2066 9.5.0 cited