Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: 'Andres Freund' <andres@anarazel.de>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai.yoshikazu@jp.fujitsu.com>, 'Simon Riggs' <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-08T02:40:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2019-04-08 02:28:12 +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > I think the linked list of LOCALLOCK approach is natural, simple, and > good. Did you see that people measured slowdowns? Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Reorder LOCALLOCK structure members to compact the size
- 28988a84cf19 12.0 landed
-
Be more careful to not lose sync in the FE/BE protocol.
- 2b3a8b20c2da 9.5.0 cited