Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: 2019-04-06T04:40:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Apr-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I've reworded the phases a bit. There was a bit of a mixup of waiting > for snapshots and waiting for lockers. Perhaps not so important from a > user's perspective, but at least now it's more consistent with the > source code comments. No disagreement with that. Looks reasonable. I didn't test the patch, but it seems OK in a quick once-over. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Report progress of REINDEX operations
- 03f9e5cba0ee 12.0 landed
-
Report progress of CREATE INDEX operations
- ab0dfc961b6a 12.0 landed
-
Fix error handling of readdir() port implementation on first file lookup
- 754b90f657bd 12.0 cited