Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Donald Dong <xdong@csumb.edu>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2019-04-01T18:55:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-04-01 20:48:41 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-04-01 20:31, Andres Freund wrote: > > I'm unhappy about this being committed. I don't think there was > > terribly much buyin for this amount of duplicated infrastructure. > > What duplicated infrastructure? A written upthread, I think this should have had a uniform interface with elog.h, and probably even share some code between the two. This is going in the wrong direction, making it harder, not easier, to share code between frontend and backend. While moving around as much code as we'd have had to do if we'd gone to error reporting compatible with elog.h. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Unified logging system for command-line programs
- cc8d41511721 12.0 landed
-
Assorted translatable string fixes
- 55a70a023c3d 10.0 cited