Re: BUG #15552: Unexpected error in COPY to a foreign table in a transaction
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Luis Carril <luis.carril@swarm64.com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-12-19T03:51:57Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:52:09AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > Hmm, note that we don't pass CopyState->freeze option to the FDW drivers > today, though we may in the future when we add an *actual* COPY interface > to FDWs. Wouldn't it be a good idea to prevent specifying the FREEZE > option for foreign tables as COPY targets until then? Of course, that's > something for -hackers to consider. No idea if that will happen. One argument for doing nothing yet is that this command does not fail now so changing it may cause compatibility problems. -- Michael
Commits
-
Disable WAL-skipping optimization for COPY on views
- 15f69279e0e8 10.7 landed
-
Disable WAL-skipping optimization for COPY on views and foreign tables
- ff9c22266906 11.2 landed
- bf491a9073e1 12.0 landed