Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-12-18T01:13:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Dec-18, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:36:17AM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 08:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Pushed with those changes. Thanks for the patch! > > > > Thanks for committing it and thanks for reviewing it, Michael. > > Perhaps too early to speak, tests of sepgsql are broken after this > commit as per rhinoceros report: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-12-18%2000%3A45%3A01 Ah, thanks. I think we need to accept the new output. It is saying that previously we would not invoke the hook on SET TABLESPACE for a partitioned table, which makes sense, and now we do invoke it, which also makes sense. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Fix tablespace handling for partitioned tables
- ca4103025dfe 12.0 landed