Thread

Commits

  1. Rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError for clarity

  1. rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2018-12-06T22:22:21Z

    Just on cleanliness grounds, I propose to rewrite the function in
    $SUBJECT.  I came across this while reviewing some already-committed
    patch for partition pruning, and it's been sitting in my laptop ever
    since.
    
    I think the current coding is too convoluted and hard to follow.  The
    patch makes it much simpler (IMO).
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera
    
  2. Re: rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2018-12-07T20:32:32Z

    On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > Just on cleanliness grounds, I propose to rewrite the function in
    > $SUBJECT.  I came across this while reviewing some already-committed
    > patch for partition pruning, and it's been sitting in my laptop ever
    > since.
    >
    > I think the current coding is too convoluted and hard to follow.  The
    > patch makes it much simpler (IMO).
    
    I don't really think this is an improvement, but the only part I
    really dislike is s/val_desc/valdsc/.  That is surely not an
    improvement in readability.
    
    -- 
    Robert Haas
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
    
    
    
  3. Re: rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> — 2018-12-28T17:52:24Z

    On 2018-Dec-07, Robert Haas wrote:
    
    > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > > Just on cleanliness grounds, I propose to rewrite the function in
    > > $SUBJECT.  I came across this while reviewing some already-committed
    > > patch for partition pruning, and it's been sitting in my laptop ever
    > > since.
    > >
    > > I think the current coding is too convoluted and hard to follow.  The
    > > patch makes it much simpler (IMO).
    > 
    > I don't really think this is an improvement, but the only part I
    > really dislike is s/val_desc/valdsc/.  That is surely not an
    > improvement in readability.
    
    Point taken; pushed with that change.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
  4. Re: rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError

    David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> — 2019-01-01T02:57:37Z

    On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 at 06:52, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
    > Point taken; pushed with that change.
    
    Marking this as committed in the CF app.
    
    -- 
     David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
     PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services