Re: More issues with pg_verify_checksums and checksum verification in base backups
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, andrew@dunslane.net, daniel@yesql.se, magnus@hagander.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Date: 2018-11-27T23:27:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, * Michael Paquier (michael@paquier.xyz) wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:45:41PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > This doesn't exactly change my opinion regarding this discussion and I'd > > rather we revert the "whitelist" patch and use the very minimal patch > > from here: > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181012013918.GA30064%40paquier.xyz > > Believe me or not, but we have spent so much energy on this stuff that I > am ready to give up on the whitelist patch and focus on other business. I would have hoped that you'd see why I was concerned from the start about this now that we have a released version of pg_verify_checksums in 11.1 that is paper-bag-worthy. > This doesn't change a couple of things though, so it is not *just* a > simple revert with the patch you mention applied: > - Adding a test for tablespaces makes sense. I agree with this, of course. > - skipfile should be called after making sure that we work on a file. It's not clear to me what this is referring to, exactly...? Can you clarify? > - temporary files and temporary paths should be ignored. There's example code for how to do this in basebackup.c > - it is necessary to exclude EXEC_BACKEND files. Agreed, they should be added to the exclude list. Thanks! Stephen
Commits
-
Fix various checksum check problems for pg_verify_checksums and base backups
- 19516afdf167 11.2 landed
- 5c995139752f 12.0 landed
-
Switch pg_verify_checksums back to a blacklist
- 85036308dc58 11.2 landed
- a1c91dd1108c 12.0 landed