Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, sk@zsrv.org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Date: 2018-11-22T13:32:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Nov-20, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > > > 4. Single API with -1 as invalid value, treat NULL as no matching. (Only > > problem > > > with this approach is till now -1 is also a valid queryid, but setting > > -1 as queryid > > > needs to be avoided. > > > > Hmm, can we use 0 as default value without any such caveat? > > Yes, with strict and 0 as default value can work. > If there is no problem, I can go ahead with the above changes? I'm not sure I understand this proposal. Does this mean that passing -1 as databaseid / userid would match all databases/users, and passing 0 as queryid would match all queries? This would be suprising, since OID is unsigned so -1 is a possibly valid value ... -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Extend pg_stat_statements_reset to reset statistics specific to a
- 43cbedab8ff1 12.0 landed
-
Default monitoring roles
- 25fff40798fc 10.0 cited