Re: doc fix for pg_stat_activity.backend_type
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-11-13T00:08:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:42:45PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > Looks like it. A quick search revealed "parallel worker" and "logical > replication worker". src/test/modules/ also show "test_shm_mq" and > "worker_spi", but it seems those don't need to be publicly documented. > If that sounds right I'll update the patch to include the first two. Just wondering: do we actually need to include in the docs this list at all? This is a recipe to forget its update each time a new backend type is added. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix the omission in docs.
- e8ba27a4ce7f 11.2 landed
- 621a8ac5af8c 12.0 landed
-
Add background worker type
- 5373bc2a0867 11.0 cited
-
Show more processes in pg_stat_activity.
- fc70a4b0df38 10.0 cited