Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent?
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-11-08T02:42:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 12:50:40PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > How about we record the tablespace option for the partitioned table in > reltablespace instead of saving it as 0. Newly created partitions > which don't have a TABLESPACE mentioned in the CREATE TABLE command > should be created in their direct parent partitioned tables > tablespace. I have seen enough complains on the mailing lists regarding the way tablespaces are handled for partitioned tables and their partitions that it looks like a very good idea to make the tablespace being inherited automatically, by setting up reltablespace to a non-zero value even if a partitioned table has no physical presence. Of course not on v11 or older releases, just on HEAD. It is no good to have partitioned indexes and partitioned tables being handling inconsistently for such things. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix tablespace handling for partitioned tables
- ca4103025dfe 12.0 landed