Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces

On 2018-Nov-07, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I think 11.0 is ready for testing that a migration from a production
> > running 10.x, but not for just blindly migrating.  If you wanted to take
> > such a leap of faith, surely you'd wait for 11.1 at the very least.
> 
> I think that's an irresponsible attitude for a committer to take.  In
> practice, you are probably right, but we shouldn't treat our
> supposedly-stable releases as if they don't really need to be kept
> stable.

I take back that part actually, in the sense that I certainly wouldn't
push patches that I didn't think were good reasonable bugfixes the week
before a release.

But, again, I don't think I was changing any behavior that anybody was
relying on.  Had anybody tried this case, they would have immediately
complained that it didn't work the way they would expect, like #14590.

> But maybe you've adopted that policy already.  You back-patched a
> behavior change 2 days before a minor release when the vote was 2-3
> against the change.

It was?  This is my count:
For: Alvaro, Andrew, Tom
Against: Michael, Robert, Andres

Also, I contested every point that was raised about this patch.  I don't
think there were any remaining technical objections.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services