Horton

Re: NOTIFY does not work as expected

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrey <parihaaraka@gmail.com>, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-10-20T00:32:29Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs 
On 2018-10-19 20:27:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I find the +1, 0, -1 pretty confusing and less clear than what was there
> > before. If we do something like it, could we introduce an enum or macros
> > for it?
> 
> Meh.  Shall I just go back to the blocked/not blocked approach?

+1

- Andres

Commits

  1. Client-side fixes for delayed NOTIFY receipt.

  2. Server-side fix for delayed NOTIFY and SIGTERM processing.

  3. Introduce and use infrastructure for interrupt processing during client reads.