Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-10-02T01:43:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:33:17PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Ah, ok. Thanks. ignore the email I just sent about that. So... This thread has basically died of inactivity, while there have been a couple of interesting things discussed, like the version from Heikki here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cd8f7b62-17e1-4307-9f81-427922e5a1f6@iki.fi I am marking the patches as returned with feedback for now. -- Michael
Commits
-
Prefetch blocks during lazy vacuum's truncation scan
- 7e26e02eec90 10.0 landed
-
Explain unaccounted for space in pgstattuple.
- 71f996d22125 10.0 cited