Horton

Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-03-21T14:20:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
David Steele wrote:

> > Sorry about the confusing comment.  It could be sometime later half of
> > the next week.
> 
> We are now three weeks into the CF with no new patch.
> 
> Are you planning to update this patch?  If not, I think it should be
> marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
> has been updated.

This is no new development, only code movement.  I think it would be
worse to have three different branches of partitioning code, v10
"basic", v11 "powerful but not reorganized", v12 "reorganized".  I'd
rather have only v10 "basic" and v11+ "powerful".

Let's keep this entry open till the last minute.  

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Reorganize partitioning code