Re: Fixes for missing schema qualifications
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: david.g.johnston@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-14T09:02:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:26:15AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > select [...] where nspname operator(pg_catalog.=) '%s' > Next question is, should we update the manual? There are bunch of > places where example queries are shown without schema qualifications. I gave https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/extend-extensions.html such an update, because extensions should assume little about the database they occupy. Perhaps a few other pages deserve that, but not the whole manual. Ordinary SQL targets a particular database and can know the set of available operators.
Commits
-
Add some missing schema qualifications
- ee2b37ae044f 12.0 landed