Re: [HACKERS] generated columns
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-02-11T14:10:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:29:09AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > That would be nice. I'm going to study this some more to see what can > be done. By the way, cannot we consider just doing stored generated columns as a first cut? Both virtual and stored columns have their use cases, but stored values have less complication and support actually a larger set of features, including rowtypes, index and constraint support. So it seems to me that if something goes into v11 then stored columns would be a better choice at this stage of the development cycle. Other DBMSs support stored values by default as well, and your v1 patch had a large portion of the work done if I recall correctly. -- Michael
Commits
-
Generated columns
- fc22b6623b6b 12.0 landed
-
Add walreceiver API to get remote server version
- 69039fda837d 12.0 landed
-
Add pg_partition_tree to display information about partitions
- d5eec4eefde7 12.0 cited
-
pg_restore: Augment documentation for -N option
- 2fe42baf7c1a 12.0 cited
-
Change delimiter used for display of NextXID
- 59a884e9854c 9.6.0 cited