Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:54:45PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> For some reason I can't apply it clean to the latest master:
> 
>     (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
>     patching file doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
>     (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
>     patching file src/backend/utils/adt/formatting.c
>     (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
>     patching file src/test/regress/expected/horology.out
>     Hunk #1 FAILED at 2769.
>     Hunk #2 FAILED at 2789.
>     Hunk #3 succeeded at 2810 with fuzz 2.
>     Hunk #4 succeeded at 2981 with fuzz 2.
>     Hunk #5 succeeded at 3011 with fuzz 2.
>     Hunk #6 FAILED at 3029.
>     3 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/test/regress/expected/horology.out.rej
>     (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.)
>     patching file src/test/regress/sql/horology.sql

It is strange. I still can apply both v9 [1] and v10 [2] via 'git
apply'. And Patch Tester [3] says that it is applied. But maybe
it is because of my git (git version 2.16.1).

You can try also 'patch -p1':

$ patch -p1 < 0001-to-timestamp-format-checking-v10.patch

1 - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180112125848.GA32559@zakirov.localdomain
2 - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180201102449.GA29082@zakirov.localdomain
3 - http://commitfest.cputube.org/

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company