Horton

Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-01-24T00:34:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:36:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Can someone confirm this so I can apply this patch?

Never mind.  I see this was applied:

	doc: mention wal_receiver_status_interval as GUC affecting logical rep worker.
	
	wal_receiver_timeout, wal_receiver_status_interval and
	wal_retrieve_retry_interval configuration parameters affect the logical rep
	worker, but previously only wal_receiver_status_interval was not mentioned
	as such parameter in the doc.
	
	Back-patch to v10 where logical rep was added.
	
	Author: Masahiko Sawada
	Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBUnuH_UsnKXyPCsCR7EAMamW0sSb6a7=WgiQRpnMAp5w@mail.gmail.com

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Commits

  1. doc: mention wal_receiver_status_interval as GUC affecting logical rep worker.