Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2018-01-19T14:04:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Jesper

Jesper Pedersen wrote:

> I get
> 
> pg_restore: creating INDEX "pg_catalog.pg_authid_oid_index"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5493; 1259 2677 INDEX
> pg_authid_oid_index jpedersen
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:  permission
> denied: "pg_authid" is a system catalog
>     Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
> SELECT pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_index_pg_class_oid('2677'::pg_catalog.oid);
> 
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "pg_authid_oid_index" ON "pg_authid" USING "btree"
> ("oid");
> 
> during check-world.

Wow, thanks for reporting.  That's freaking weird ...  Maybe I need to
use a more restrictive condition.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Local partitioned indexes

  2. Fix StoreCatalogInheritance1 to use 32bit inhseqno

  3. Get rid of copy_partition_key

  4. Simplify index_[constraint_]create API