Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2018-01-19T14:04:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Jesper
Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> I get
>
> pg_restore: creating INDEX "pg_catalog.pg_authid_oid_index"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 5493; 1259 2677 INDEX
> pg_authid_oid_index jpedersen
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: permission
> denied: "pg_authid" is a system catalog
> Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
> SELECT pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_index_pg_class_oid('2677'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "pg_authid_oid_index" ON "pg_authid" USING "btree"
> ("oid");
>
> during check-world.
Wow, thanks for reporting. That's freaking weird ... Maybe I need to
use a more restrictive condition.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Local partitioned indexes
- 8b08f7d4820f 11.0 landed
-
Fix StoreCatalogInheritance1 to use 32bit inhseqno
- 1ef61ddce908 11.0 landed
- 9a215fb4b5ec 9.3.21 landed
- 8a71ee628854 9.6.7 landed
- 61f08c016322 10.2 landed
- 1284d18b5de9 9.4.16 landed
- 0d993709a773 9.5.11 landed
-
Get rid of copy_partition_key
- 8a0596cb656e 11.0 landed
-
Simplify index_[constraint_]create API
- a61f5ab98638 11.0 landed