Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Date: 2018-01-16T16:50:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2018-01-16 16:12:11 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:26:50AM +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> @@ -73,11 +73,19 @@ pg_atomic_compare_exchange_u32_impl(volatile pg_atomic_uint32 *ptr,
> >> static inline uint32
> >> pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32_impl(volatile pg_atomic_uint32 *ptr, int32 add_)
> >> {
> >> + uint32 ret;
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> - * __fetch_and_add() emits a leading "sync" and trailing "isync", thereby
> >> - * providing sequential consistency. This is undocumented.
> >> + * Use __sync() before and __isync() after, like in compare-exchange
> >> + * above.
> >> */
> >> - return __fetch_and_add((volatile int *)&ptr->value, add_);
> >> + __sync();
> >> +
> >> + ret = __fetch_and_add((volatile int *)&ptr->value, add_);
> >> +
> >> + __isync();
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> }
> >
> > Since this emits double syncs with older xlc, I recommend instead replacing
> > the whole thing with inline asm. As I opined in the last message of the
> > thread you linked above, the intrinsics provide little value as abstractions
> > if one checks the generated code to deduce how to use them. Now that the
> > generated code is xlc-version-dependent, the port is better off with
> > compiler-independent asm like we have for ppc in s_lock.h.
>
> Could it be cleaner to just use __xlc_ver__ to avoid double syncs on
> past versions? I think that it would make the code more understandable
> than just listing directly the instructions.
Given the quality of the intrinsics on AIX, see past commits and the
comment in the code quoted above, I think we're much better of doing
this via inline asm.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
For all ppc compilers, implement compare_exchange and fetch_add with asm.
- 30ee5d17c20d 13.0 landed
-
For PowerPC instruction "addi", use constraint "b".
- 930787c7fab9 9.4.25 landed
- af4477b00cf9 11.6 landed
- 62e881946c4d 9.5.20 landed
- 09d74aef33de 9.6.16 landed
- 083929372e04 10.11 landed
- ef13f914e6c2 12.1 landed
- 89b4d7744c80 13.0 landed
-
For all ppc compilers, implement pg_atomic_fetch_add_ with inline asm.
- e7ff59686eac 13.0 landed
-
Replace xlc __fetch_and_add() with inline asm.
- a1df9a015dac 9.6.16 landed
- 8972ac696665 10.11 landed
- 75941f257aac 9.5.20 landed
- 40ad4202513c 11.6 landed
- 1c6b62a7d0e5 12.0 landed
- dd50f1a43290 13.0 landed
-
Test pg_atomic_fetch_add_ with variable addend and 16-bit edge cases.
- e6a90ded5a6c 10.11 landed
- 8d32f82cbbbb 9.6.16 landed
- 4737d3a75b72 9.5.20 landed
- 5b5b0f721d9c 12.0 landed
- 585fc561f824 11.6 landed
- f380c5190134 13.0 landed