Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-01-16T06:21:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
> 
> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\"  has now caught up with upstream
> server"?

+1.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Make logical WAL sender report streaming state appropriately