Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, dian.m.fay@gmail.com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-18T08:08:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes:
>>> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread.
>> 
>> Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about
>> documentation (with an already-committed fix).
> 
> I apologize if it was interpreted as hijacking, I had brought it up in
> my initial reply to Dian, as I’ve seen others do similarly on threads.

Don't worry, we all learn here ;)
I saw your patch, looked at it a couple of seconds and got really
surprised by its logic, moving to something else before lookng back at
it.

>> I'd suggest reposting that patch in its own thread and adding it to
>> the next CF.
> 
> I will go ahead and do this.

Thanks for spawning a different thread.  That helps in attracting the
correct attention to the correct issues.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs