Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>, dian.m.fay@gmail.com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-18T08:08:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 05:12:42PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> writes: >>> So it seems this patch is being ignored in this thread. >> >> Well, Jonathan did kind of hijack what appears to be a thread about >> documentation (with an already-committed fix). > > I apologize if it was interpreted as hijacking, I had brought it up in > my initial reply to Dian, as I’ve seen others do similarly on threads. Don't worry, we all learn here ;) I saw your patch, looked at it a couple of seconds and got really surprised by its logic, moving to something else before lookng back at it. >> I'd suggest reposting that patch in its own thread and adding it to >> the next CF. > > I will go ahead and do this. Thanks for spawning a different thread. That helps in attracting the correct attention to the correct issues. -- Michael
Commits
-
Mention ownership requirements for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW in docs
- b6c994af1f0d 9.3.25 landed
- 777192f0dd44 9.4.20 landed
- 82784f088986 9.5.15 landed
- 86e873c01650 9.6.11 landed
- 0dfaf8f763ae 10.6 landed
- b43cf1dcded9 11.0 landed
- ee8012481190 12.0 landed