Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-08-15T21:49:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-08-15 15:57:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd always thought this was only in C++.  This alone might be a sufficient
> reason to drop C89 compiler support ...

It's also IIRC reasonably widely supported from before C99. So, for the
sake of designated initializers, for loop scoping, snprintf, let's do
this in master?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove test for VA_ARGS, implied by C99.

  2. Introduce minimal C99 usage to verify compiler support.

  3. Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).

  4. Require a C99-compliant snprintf(), and remove related workarounds.

  5. Try to enable C99 in configure, but do not rely on it (yet).

  6. Make snprintf.c follow the C99 standard for snprintf's result value.

  7. Clean up assorted misuses of snprintf()'s result value.