Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-08-15T21:49:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2018-08-15 15:57:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I'd always thought this was only in C++. This alone might be a sufficient > reason to drop C89 compiler support ... It's also IIRC reasonably widely supported from before C99. So, for the sake of designated initializers, for loop scoping, snprintf, let's do this in master? Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove test for VA_ARGS, implied by C99.
- 8ecdefc261ab 12.0 landed
-
Introduce minimal C99 usage to verify compiler support.
- 143290efd079 12.0 landed
-
Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).
- d9dd406fe281 12.0 landed
-
Require a C99-compliant snprintf(), and remove related workarounds.
- e1d19c902e59 12.0 landed
-
Try to enable C99 in configure, but do not rely on it (yet).
- 86d78ef50e01 12.0 landed
-
Make snprintf.c follow the C99 standard for snprintf's result value.
- c2a2e331da17 9.6.11 landed
- 1811900b933c 10.6 landed
- 36147ec9f1e2 11.0 landed
- a57a6faf6011 9.3.25 landed
- 27c4b0899c0e 9.4.20 landed
- 8e9f229d2bf6 9.5.15 landed
- 805889d7d23f 12.0 landed
-
Clean up assorted misuses of snprintf()'s result value.
- d7ed4eea539d 11.0 landed
- d371efb39c33 9.4.20 landed
- c81062e8e12f 9.5.15 landed
- c182c1e0b895 9.6.11 landed
- 6101bc2f459c 10.6 landed
- 3531365de5e8 9.3.25 landed
- cc4f6b778618 12.0 landed