Re: Improve behavior of concurrent TRUNCATE
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-09T16:30:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Refactor-TRUNCATE-execution-to-avoid-too-early-lock-.patch (text/x-diff) patch 0001
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 03:27:04PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > Thanks! This patch builds cleanly, the new tests pass, and my manual > testing hasn't uncovered any issues. Notably, I cannot reproduce the > originally reported authentication issue by using TRUNCATE after this > change. Beyond a few small comment wording suggestions below, it > looks good to me. Thanks, I have updated the patch as you suggested. Any more improvements to it that you can foresee? > The second and fourth tests don't seem to actually block. Yeah, that's intentional. -- Michael
Commits
-
Improve TRUNCATE by avoiding early lock queue
- f841ceb26d70 12.0 landed