Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-08-09T01:27:07Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 09:53:42PM +0700, Chris Travers wrote: > It seems to me that this would still provide enough historical > info for just about any ordinary interest. We could discuss ways > of making a complete release-note archive available somewhere, > if "go dig in the git repo" doesn't seem like an adequate answer > for that. > > Works for me. Especially with a release note archive available somewhere. Works for me, though, is there no interest in keeping the SGML files in the git tree and just not building them as docs? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Commits
-
Doc: in each release branch, keep only that branch's own release notes.
- ed64db588a67 9.5.16 landed
- bb428cb11722 9.4.21 landed
- 60b1d6c2a736 9.6.12 landed
- 2b24271153ec 10.7 landed
- 0d13dd371b64 11.2 landed
- 527b5ed1ad46 12.0 landed