Re: Possible bug in logical replication.
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-07-19T04:42:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:38:53AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Jul-19, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I am fine either way if you want to have the last call. So please feel >> free to choose what you prefer here. That's no big deal. > > Okay. You want to push it, or shall I? It seems to me that you are on it more than I. So please go ahead. Thanks for asking. -- Michael
Commits
-
Rewrite comments in replication slot advance implementation
- 96bd49437cca 11.0 landed
- 1573995f5599 12.0 landed
-
Fix a couple of bugs with replication slot advancing feature
- f731cfa94c00 11.0 landed
-
Ability to advance replication slots
- 9c7d06d60680 11.0 cited