Re: Fix some error handling for read() and errno

On 2018-Jul-14, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:31:31AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Mr. Robot has been complaining about this patch set, so attached is a
> >> rebased version.  Thinking about it, I would tend to just merge 0001 and
> >> give up on 0002 as that may not justify future backpatch pain.  Thoughts
> >> are welcome.
> > 
> > I vote to push both.
> 
> Thanks!  Did you look at the code?  The first patch is just some
> cleanup, while the second could have adjustments?  For the second I went
> with the minimal amount of work, and actually there is no need to make
> ReadTransientFile() return a status per my study of ReadTwoPhaseFile()
> in https://postgr.es/m/20180709050309.GM1467@paquier.xyz which must fail
> when reading the file.  So patch 0002 depends on the other 2PC patch.

I did read them, though not in minute detail.  0002 seems to result in
code easier to read.  If there are particular places that deviate from
the obvious patterns, I didn't notice them.

In 0001 one thing I wasn't terribly in love with was random deviations
in sprintf format specifiers for things that should be identical, ie.
%lu in some places and %zu in others, for "read only %d of %d".  It
seems you should pick the more general one (%zu) and use casts to Size
(or is it size_t?) in the places that have other types.  That way you
*really* decrease translator effort to the bare minimum :-)

Ah, in 0001 you have one case of "could not read _from_" (in
SimpleXLogPageRead).  The "from" is not present in the other places.
Looks odd.

I'm not sure about putting the wait event stuff inside the new
functions.  It looks odd, though I understand why you did it.

No opinion on the 2PC stuff -- didn't look at that.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services