Re: Incorrect errno used with %m for backend code
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-25T02:26:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 09:22:01AM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >> Okay, I too had a quick look into the source code to see if there are >> still some places where we could have missed to set an errno to ENOSPC >> in case of write system call failure but, couldn't find any such place >> in the code. The v2 version of patch looks good to me. > > Thanks for the review. I'll try to wrap that tomorrow with proper > patches for back-branches as things diverge a bit here and there. Pushed down to 9.3. All branches conflicted, and particularly in pg_basebackup some write() calls have been moved around. -- Michael
Commits
-
Address set of issues with errno handling
- f53ed82b7fee 9.3.24 landed
- 79b5b101f992 9.4.19 landed
- 910e2aca129c 9.5.14 landed
- 7fdf56b0a796 9.6.10 landed
- 6eec6724ff45 10.5 landed
- 6cb3372411fd 11.0 landed