Re: Incorrect errno used with %m for backend code

On 2018-Jun-22, Michael Paquier wrote:

> A couple of places use CloseTransientFile without bothering much that
> this can overwrite errno.  I was tempted in keeping errno saved and kept
> if set to a non-zero value, but refrained from doing so as some callers
> may rely on the existing behavior, and the attached shows better the
> intention. 

I wondered for a bit if it would be a better idea to have
CloseTransientFile restore the existing errno if there is any and close
works fine -- when I noticed that that function itself says that caller
should check errno for close() errors.  Most callers seem to do it
correctly, but a few fail to check the return value.  

Quite some places open files O_RDONLY, so lack of error checking after
closing seems ok.  (Unless there's some funny interaction with the fsync
fiasco, of course.)

A bunch of other places use CloseTransientFile while closing shop after
some other syscall failure, which is what your patch fixes.  I didn't
review those; checking for close failure seems pointless.

In some cases, we fsync the file and check that return value, then close
the file and do *not* check CloseTransientFile's return value --
examples are CheckPointLogicalRewriteHeap, heap_xlog_logical_rewrite,
SnapBuildSerialize, SaveSlotToPath, durable_rename.  I don't know if
it's reasonable for close() to fail after successfully fsyncing a file;
maybe this is not a problem.  I would patch those nonetheless.

be_lo_export() is certainly missing a check: it writes and closes,
without intervening fsync.

I don't understand the logic in RestoreSlotFromDisk that fsync the file
prior to reading it.  What are we protecting against?


Anyway, while I think it would be nice to have CloseTransientFile
restore the original errno if there was one and close goes well, it
probably unduly complicates its API contract.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services