Horton

Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-06-20T04:47:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:32:58PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Just a minor nit in the last sentence:
> 
> "have to be from" -> "must be from / must belong to"

I think that both have the same meaning, but I am no native speaker so I
may be missing a nuance of some kind.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees