Horton

Re: partition -> partitioned

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-06-20T03:59:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2018-Jun-20, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:02:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Noticed that the relevant code changed, so I rebased the patch.  Also,
> > made a minor update to a nearby comment.
> 
> That looks right to me as we speak about non-leaf partitions here.
> Alvaro, as 499be013 is yours, would you fix this inconsistency or should
> I?  I could understand why things are confusing on HEAD, "partitioned"
> and "partition" have opposite meanings.

Hmm, will look.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Consistently use the term 'partitioned rel' in partprune comments

  2. Support partition pruning at execution time