Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-09T21:04:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the > patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed > Peter's source of complaint, though. AFAICS your patch just adds test > cases, and upthread discussion apparently converges on not doing > anything about the code. I'm not yet sure what to think of that ... Thanks Álvaro. I tend to think that there is little point in changing the error handling, still it would be good to get test coverage. That's not really a bug though as in all those cases we don't get errors like "could not open file" or such. So we could also let things as they are now. -- Michael
Commits
-
pgstatindex, pageinspect: handle partitioned indexes
- bef5fcc36be3 11.0 landed
-
Add relkind 'I' to catalog.sgml's list relkinds
- 550091f218ce 11.0 landed