Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-08T13:32:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:00:59PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > Many thanks for reviewing this. 2nd round - from the minimalist department: + partitions which cannot possibly contain any matching records. maybe: partitions which cannot match any records. + <para> + Partition pruning done during execution can be performed at any of the + following times: remove "done"? + number of partitions which were removed during this phase of pruning by remove "of prunning" Justin
Commits
-
Tweak partitioning documentation wording
- 12b9affb32a6 11.0 landed
-
docs: Rework sections on partition pruning/exclusion
- bebc46931a12 11.0 landed
-
Add GUC enable_partition_pruning
- 055fb8d33da6 11.0 landed