Horton

Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-02T06:14:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:38:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.

That's what Peter is pointing to upthread and what the v1 of upthread
was doing.  I would tend to think to just keep the code simple and don't
add those extra checks, but I am fine to be beaten as well.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. pgstatindex, pageinspect: handle partitioned indexes

  2. Add relkind 'I' to catalog.sgml's list relkinds