Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-23T23:52:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Fine, but that doesn't answer the question of whether we actually need
> to or should change the behavior in the first place.

Per the last arguments that would be "No, we don't want to change it as
it would surprise some users":
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180420010402.GF2024@paquier.xyz
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix assertion failure when updating full_page_writes for checkpointer.

  2. Attach FPI to the first record after full_page_writes is turned on.

  3. Revamp the WAL record format.

  4. Move the backup-block logic from XLogInsert to a new file, xloginsert.c.